I guess the jury is still out on 'wet or dry' filters. Currently i am still a fan of wet, The dry ones are very limited in the configurations at this time. I have seen great results with wet as well as many problems created by them. I have no issues with the K&N on the 96, I have never bought a replacement filter for it. it now has over 170 K in it. But I do see some issue with a turbo with an over serviced filter, an oil residue and dust or an air leak that causes it to stick to balanced parts. I have not decided what I want to get for mine yet, the prices are unreasonable and the actual test results don't show a tremenous improvement on MPG or power. Servicablility would be the only reason to get on until some one comes out with an proven unit. I under stand there is a K&N drop in for the 6.7's, (It's a wet filter). good luck and keep us informed.

__________________
07.5 3500 Quad, SRW, 4X4, Laramie, Leathered, Dark Metallic Gray, 6.7, 68RFE, 20K Reese, Ride Rite's, 2 Viair air compressors, Bully steps, Kleinn Locomotive air horns (5 in all), Billet polished locking fuel door, 'A' pillar mount Auto Meter Pryo, PML X-deep trans pan
06 Durango 285 RL 5'er Lifted by KZ